|
|
Findings
of fire research results on major fires
EPIC’s research into major
fires and the types of construction
This first major study of its kind analysed over 400 major fires in the industrial
and commercial sector with a loss of more than £500,000. The research
shows that insulated panels with polyurethane cores were associated with only
3% of major building fires over the 10 year research period to 2001.
Of the handful of building fires in which external panels have become involved,
the internal fire load was of sufficient magnitude to result in the collapse
of the building structure. The contribution of the building panels in those
fires was insignificant.
 |
Major losses are independent
of the form of construction |
 |
 |
97% of fires were in constructions using ‘traditional’ building
materials – brick, metal, asbestos, slate etc. |
 |
 |
Only 3% by value and number of fires involved
polyurethane insulated panel constructions compared with an
estimated 15% of building stock in this sector |
 |
 |
13% of the fires, equivalent to 27% of monetary
loss, involved sandwich panels with polystyrene cores used
internally – |
 |
 |
80% of the major fires were associated with
a high internal fire load |
 |
 |
Contents such as chemicals, plastics, paper,
furniture, fabrics, rubber, timber are likely to lead to a
total / major loss irrespective of the building materials |
|
 |
Research covered a 10 year period – 1992
to 2001 |
 |
 |
Largest research of its kind to look at
the relationship between major fires and the building envelope |
 |
 |
Sources of information were:
– Fire Protection Association records
– EPIC’s data base records and photographs
– Fire service reports
– FRS and Loss Prevention Council |
|
There is no evidence to indicate that polyurethane
insulated panels designed for external application for roofs and walls
and firmly supported by the building framework should be considered differently
from other envelope construction materials.
These research findings also fully support the continuing demands from Insurance
Industry and the Fire Services for better management of fire safety in the
industrial and commercial sector; and the increased use of compartmentation
in construction.
Research findings
Table 1: Analysis of major fires by number – 1992
to 2001
Type of construction
[Industrial / commercial] |
No. of fires over
£ 500,000 loss |
Additional comments |
 |
Traditional – brick/slate &
tile/asbestos/some metal |
92 (51.4%) |
10 projects involved polystyrene panels installed internally |
 |
Metal cladding
(predominantly) |
81 (44.5%) |
13 projects involved polystyrene panels installed internally |
 |
Insulated panels
(polyurethane) |
6 (3.4%) |
3 projects originally reported as panels were found to be PU lining
board. |
 |
Table 2: Analysis of major fires by value – 1992
to 2001
Type of construction
[Industrial / commercial] |
Value of fires
£’ M |
Additional comments |
 |
Traditional – brick/slate &
tile/asbestos/some metal
Metal cladding
(predominantly) |
531.3 (96.9%) |
£146.9M (26.8%) was in buildings using polystyrene panels
installed internally – primarily in the food industry |
 |
Insulated panels
(polyurethane) |
16.9 (3.1%) |
|
 |
Insulated Panels used as roofs and walls
Insulated panels have been used for external
roof and wall cladding since the mid 1970’s. EPIC estimate that
approximately 70 million m2 are
currently in use without problems or concerns. Over 95% of these panels
were manufactured with a polyurethane insulating core.
The Loss Prevention Council and the majority of Fire
Services and insurance companies now recognise the totally different
nature and performance of steel faced, structurally supported insulated
panels used for external roofs and walls. This is due to the very low
incidence of these panels in major fires and the relatively low risk
of a fully secured panel to fire fighters. Back to top.
Also in this section:
Fire performance
of insulated panels | Guide
to fire safety | Fire
tests |
Fire
research – case histories |