Specification and design Energy conservation Fire performance Insurance
 
EPIC Logo
  Panels from EPIC Members are now manufactured with PIR cores to satisfy insulation requirements
Insullated cladding systems: performance in fire. Watch video online.
Requires free Flash player
Search site
Home
News
Topics of interest
EPIC members
Links to other sites
Order guides online

new EPIC e-bulletin. Click here to register.

Contact EPIC
29 High Street
Ewell
Surrey KT17 1SB
Tel +44 (0)20 8786 3619
Fax +44 (0)20 8786 8887
Email
info@epic.uk.com

All content © 2004 EPIC.
All rights reserved.

 

The EPIC fire tests

Europe's most comprehensive fire test research results
The EPIC fire research programme tested panels designed for external use in roof and wall applications. The test method used was the LPS 1181 large room test and was authenticated by independent bodies and conducted strictly in accordance with established standards.

Rigid urethane panels manufactured by EPIC members are designed to the highest factory engineered standards. They are designed for use with secure fixings and engineered joints for maximum fire protection and security. 90% of all external roof and wall panels used on modern commercial and industrial buildings use rigid urethane – the most thermally efficient insulation. These panels have performed well for over 30 years and have given little or no cause for concern.

Why test?
Specifiers, building professionals, insurers and the fire services need to be aware of the facts in order to be confident that a panel system will perform satisfactorily and meet the required safety criteria.

How were the EPIC tests carried out?
The EPIC tests assessed panels as they are installed in practice using the LPS 1181 test method. Fire performance depends on the method of installation; security of fixing; joint detail and joint design. Any test that does not test panels as they are installed in practice should be disregarded.

The EPIC test programme also tested other cladding panels with MW and PS cores and site assembled systems with glass wool insulation.

The test results show clearly how a urethane cored external panel is likely to perform in fire – no collapse; low contribution to a fire in the developing stages; and the beneficial effect of tight fire engineered joints. Both PUR and PIR urethanes were tested.

For details of the results see “Performance of external cladding systems in fire” and EPIC Fire CD-ROM.

Tests confirm why PIR insulated panels have a good fire record
Panels satisfy all the current required Building Regulations – BS476 Pts. 6,7,8 and 22
PIR panels satisfy the additional requirements and test standards of the Insurance industry – Loss Prevention Council and Factory Mutual
The panels for external cladding are firmly secured to the structural frame of the building – there is no collapse
Panel joints are fully engineered to provide excellent weather and airtightness and also to protect the core material in the event of fire – panel joints do not open and expose the core.
Steel facings fully protect the core. Any contribution eg. smoke / gasses is relatively low during the developing stages of a fire and remains so unless the fire becomes fully developed
PIR panels do not add to the severity of the fire. There is no instant release of the heat load nor rapid flashover. There is no hidden flaming or fire spread within the core of the panel

Observations on fire testing and other tests

Guidelines for assessing fire tests for external cladding systems accurately
1. The type of test should be clear. Tests are designed to illustrate either Reaction to Fire or Fire Resistance.
2. The test method should assess panels in end use application i.e. fixed as in practice to supporting steelwork. Fire performance depends on the method of installation; security of fixing; joint detail and joint design. Any test that does not test panels as they are installed in practice should be disregarded.
3. The panel product tested should be designed for external cladding use. An 'internal' panel is not indicative of external panel performance.
4. Large scale tests are more indicative of fire performance than small scale tests. Panels for test should be taken from a standard production run.
5. Panels of unknown origin negate the test results.  

The truth behind some recent fire tests
The EPIC test programme is the only fire research to date that has tested panels designed for external roof and wall application where they are fixed as in practice to structural steel.

For details of the results see “Performance of external cladding systems in fire” and EPIC Fire CD-ROM.

Some recent fire performance tests have not been carried out in accordance with the above guidelines and have resulted in misleading information being issued.
 
Eurisol Test
These tests were carried out based on a modification of the proposed ISO 13784 Pt 2 with increased burner output and dimension.

Both PIR and PUR panels were tested. The official test report states the PIR panel, frame fixed, performed virtually as well as the rockfibre cored panel. (There is no mention of this fact in the Eurisol promotional release).

The results for the standard urethane panel should be totally disregarded as being representative of external roof and wall panels.

The reasons are as follows:
The panel was of a design used for internal partition use only
The joint system was a simple T&G and not a typical external engineered joint
The panels were free standing and loosely fixed. This led to a false premature collapse
The core material was of unknown formulation. It was a bonded panel and not a standard external panel made on a continuous laminator.

Note: The summary test report states that "The results only relate to the specific tests performed on the structure as constructed and cannot be considered as representative of generic sandwich panel type fire performance".
 
Leipzig Tests
Some early videos show panels being tested to the now discarded ISO 13784 draft proposal. In these tests the panels were also a free standing loose assembly not fixed to a frame and therefore not following site practice. The panels provided for the tests were of internal panel design and were not standard external panels to a fully engineered design.

Both the Eurisol and the Leipzig tests should be disregarded as an indicator of performance of typical external sandwich panels.
 
What tests assess panels as they are installed in practice and on a real scale?
The following Fire tests are designed to assess the Reaction to Fire Performance i.e. the developing stage of a fire. (They are not Fire Resistance tests that assess penetration and insulation at the fully developed fire stage.)

1. LPC Test - LPS1181 (The EPIC Tests)
Large scale. Panels fixed as in practice and on a real scale. Significant heat source that challenges the joints. Temperature >1000°C. Assesses security of fixing; fire penetration; contribution of core material; effect of radiation; flaming, smoke and flashover; surface spread of flame.

2. FM Test - FM4880
Similar in concept to the LPS test. Based on 25ft corner test and small room scale test.

3. ISO 9705
Small room scale: Designed to test internal linings of walls. Panels cannot be installed as in practice. Not relevant as a test for external panels.

4. ISODIS 13784 Pt1
Small room scale. Variation on ISO9705. Panels can be free standing or fixed to a frame. Still to be proven

5. ISODIS 13784 Pt2
Large room scale: Similar in many respects to LPS 1181 test, real scale. Panels can be fixed as in practice. Still to be proven.

Back to top. Also in this section:
Fire performance of insulated panels  |  Guide to fire safety  |
Findings of fire research on major fires  |  Fire research – case histories