Refurbishment
Case
for refurbishment – an issue for our time
As much as it would be preferable to move into
new individually designed premises for a business activity, in the majority
of cases it is not practically or
feasibly possible in terms of cost, disruption, workforce and geography.
For
premises that are old, depressing and cash sinks in terms of energy
and maintenance costs, refurbishment is the only practical option in
the majority
of cases. Insulated panels have been used to improve the building fabric
and the ‘bottom line’ ever since their introduction in
the 1970s.
Much of the existing building
stock within the industrial, commercial
and public sectors was built to different standards and requirements
and at a time of
relatively low energy costs and life expectancy. Expectations have changed
beyond recognition in recent years, both in terms of the working environment – visual
and required comfort – and also the external environment and environs.
Changes
in regulatory requirements
Regulations have also materially changed. Energy is a now major issue
in terms of cost, its conservation, contribution to emissions that
affects global warming
and potential tax penalties. Older buildings compare unfavourably with
modern buildings constructed to the latest requirements and their viability
can be
questioned if action is not taken. Many also raise serious safety concerns
with the continued presence of asbestos and other structural safety
issues.
From 2006 new requirements under the amendments
to the Building Regulations for England and Wales, Northern Ireland,
and Scotland have placed new responsibilities on the Building Owner.
They have further tightened the energy saving measures that were introduced
in the 2002 Regulations as part of the European Directive to reduce
carbon emissions from buildings and have as a major addition introduced
the concept of Energy Performance Certificates, starting with larger
buildings and specifically Public Sector Buildings in 2008. Read
more: See EPIC Guide to the amendments to the Building Regulations (2006) – Refurbishment
sections 5 and 6 can be separately downloaded from the main Guide.
PIR Insulated panels – the
refurbishment solution for the future
| • |
Single piece construction meaning
rapid refurbishment programme |
| • |
Minimum disruption |
| • |
Built-in insulation giving payback
from day one |
| • |
Aesthetic options and modern look |
| • |
Safe, secure and minimum maintenance. |
These are just
some of the reasons why refurbishment with insulated panels has become
the dominant feature of the refurbishment market.
| There are two principal options
for the refurbishment of the building envelope with insulated panels |
| • |
Removal and replacement
with panels |
| • |
Flat-to-pitched roof
conversion with panels |
Removal and replacement
with insulated panels
Old roof constructions of slates and tiles, northlights with felt
slopes, A-frame with louvers, or profiled asbestos sheets
are a major cause
of huge energy
losses in existing buildings, as well as being responsible
for accelerating maintenance bills and increasing health and safety
problems for management
and the maintenance departments.
Walls, which are the immediate
visual image of any company or operation often look tired, worn
out and uninviting as well as being
energy inefficient.
Replacement with PIR insulated
panels is simple, fast and immediate. In the majority of cases the
existing
structure
can be used or easily
adapted
and
the use of single-piece factory engineered panels delivered
to site allows the phasing of the project with minimum
disruption to the
operation of
the building.
The following projects are examples of failing building
envelopes replaced with insulated panels.
 |
|
 |
| Before |
|
After |
Energy savings means payback starts immediately with
insulated panels.
 |
|
 |
| Before |
|
After |
Refurbishment with insulated panels means an efficient,
low air-leakage, high performance building.
 |
|
 |
| Before |
|
After |
Replacement of old asbestos
Buildings with asbestos can be a major cause for concern and present
specific problems for building owners / occupiers under ‘Regulation
4 of Health and Control of Asbestos at Work 2002’ (effective:
21st May 2004).
Fragile asbestos roofs are a continual safety problem
for those responsible for maintenance and repairs and also a concern
where
there is trespass onto
the roof area.
Replacement of asbestos by structurally strong insulated
panels immediately creates a legally safe working platform without
health rules and implications.
Significant energy savings can also be
made. Comparisons between high performance insulated panels with low
air leakage and old single
skin asbestos sheets show energy savings as high as 90%.
 |
|
 |
| Before |
|
After |
Flat-to-pitched
conversion with insulated panels
The use of lightweight galvanised steel trusses
and lightweight PIR insulated panels are now extensively used in the
conversion of ageing
and faulty
flat roofs to pitched roofs.
Conversion removes in one operation the problems
of ageing/high maintenance roofs, failed waterproofings, poor falls
and insufficient and blocked
drains; and the inability to economically improve insulation values
due to inadequate curbs and upstands etc.
The following projects are
examples of failed roofs replaced with insulated panels.
 |
|
 |
| Before |
|
After |
 |
|
 |
| Before |
|
After |
 |
|
 |
| Before |
|
After |
| Buildings refurbished and modernised using PIR insulated
panels: |
| • |
Extend the economic life by up to 40 years |
| • |
Enhance the business image and building appearance |
| • |
Improve the working environment and productivity performance |
| • |
Reduce building operating and maintenance costs |
| • |
Facilitate property transactions and increase property asset and
rental values |
| • |
Enhance tenant lease out and attractiveness. |
Contact EPIC Members for advice
and guidance on the use of PIR insulated panels for the refurbishment of existing
buildings.
Back to top. |