| Insulated
panels and the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety)
Managing risk under the Regulatory
Reform Order
The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order – which
became effective in England and Wales in October 2006 – represents
one of the most significant pieces of fire legislation in recent decades.
Its aim is to reduce death, injury and damage caused by fire, and it
heralds a new proactive approach to managing risk.
The main effect of
the Fire Safety Order is to place greater emphasis on fire prevention
in non-domestic premises. Fire certificates will now be abolished and
the responsibility for compliance with the Order will rest with the ‘responsible
person’. This is generally the
person in control of the premises, such as the employer, occupier or
owner.
The responsible person must carry out a fire risk assessment, the
focus of which is the safety in case of fire of all ‘relevant persons’.
This task may be passed to some other competent person, but the responsible
person still holds responsibility for meeting the Order. The risk assessment
will help the responsible person to identify fire risks that can be removed
or reduced, and to decide the extent of the general precautions that
should be taken to protect people against the fire risks that remain.
Responsibility
for enforcement of the new rules lies with the local fire and rescue
authority, which will carry out regular inspections, especially of premises
that present most risk to the community. These inspections will be carried
out within the context of the integrated risk management planning agenda
for the UK fire and rescue service.
The Department for Communities and
Local Government (DCLG) has issued A short guide to making your premises
safe from fire, together with a series of guides on how to carry out
risk assessments for different types of identified building premises.
The guides provide information on what to look for in order to minimise
the risk from fire. Any fire risk assessment naturally needs to cover
a wide range of aspects, including possible sources of ignition, escape
routes and the combustibility of the fabric of the building – and
it is this last issue that has raised some concerns in the construction
industry.
Suitable and sufficient assessment
of the building fabric
Under the section ‘Identifying a fire
hazard’, the DCLG
guides list ‘insulated core panels’ as a potential source
of fuel to be considered in a fire risk assessment. However, by not
distinguishing sufficiently between the many different types of panel,
insulant and application, there is a danger that the responsible person
will be led to believe that their building represents a risk where
it does not, or will be unable to identify where the real risks are.
Managing risk involves having adequate and accurate information. Without
clear guidance, mistakes could be made that are costly, either in financial
terms or in terms of human life.
Even though the building fabric and
insulated panels only form a small part of the fire risk assessment,
it is crucial to base the assessment on the correct information and
not on a generalised view about the behaviour of insulated panels in
a fire. In recognition of the need for clearer guidance, Engineered
Panels in Construction (EPIC) has produced a comprehensive guide to
the main points that concern insulated panels when conducting a fire
risk assessment under the Fire Safety Order. The guide, Insulated panels
and the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order, will not only
be of interest to responsible persons and competent persons undertaking
risk assessments, it is also intended to be an invaluable tool for
the fire and rescue service and insurance surveyors alike.
| The guide is designed to make it easy
for those carrying out the assessment to identify whether or not
the premises represents a potential risk. It includes information
on: |
| • |
Insulated panels and where they are found in construction |
| • |
Their performance in fire |
| • |
How to identify panels and other systems |
Making the right assessment
First step.
The first step is to ascertain whether or not the building is constructed
using insulated panels. Certain insulated lining systems, such as insulation
boards with thin facings on either side – for
example, aluminium foil or bituminous felts – are often wrongly
described as ‘panels’. Great care should be taken to check
that a wall or wall lining is a panel and not a board.
Insulated panels
normally consist of two metal facings either side of an insulating
core. The core is either bonded to the facings using a polyurethane
adhesive in the case of mineral fibre panels, or by auto-adhesion in
the case of polyurethane and phenolic cores. There is no air gap between
the core and the facings. The panels are manufactured in a factory
and delivered to the construction site as a single piece unit.
 |
|
Insulated panels normally consist of two metal facings, either
side of an insulating core. The core is either bonded to the facings
using an adhesive or by auto-adhesion in the case of polyurethane
and phenolic cores. There is no air gap between the core and the
facings |
Insulated panels are generally regarded as non-structural,
although they are strong rigid units that act compositely when under load.
This strength allows loads such as wind or static forces to be transmitted
to the supporting structure, and it is this property that distinguishes
panels from other types of insulated lining systems. It is important to
make this distinction because the mechanical and fire properties of panels
can be totally different to those of alternative forms of construction.
Second
step. Having looked at the nature of the construction, the second stage
is to consider other aspects such as the materials used. For example, the
central core can be made of any one of a variety of insulating materials,
each with different characteristics. The choice of insulation has a direct
bearing on the performance of a panel in fire and therefore the fire risk
assessment.
The most commonly used core material for insulated panels is
polyurethane (PUR) or polyisocyanurate (PIR). From the mid 1990s, the insulating
panel industry gradually moved from PUR to all panels being manufactured
using PIR by 2004. Mineral wool (MW) cores are used in a variety of panels
for walls, ceilings and internal compartment walls. Polystyrene (PS) has
been used as a core material for over 30 years, mainly for panels used
internally and for cold store panels.
Understanding Panel performance in
fire Fire risk assessment under the Fire Safety Order is primarily concerned
with life safety and the prevention of fire. This is very different from
assessing a building from the viewpoint of property protection or that
of the fire services, where the fire is likely to be fully developed rather
than a developing fire.
It is therefore important to take full account of
the fact that at the critical personnel evacuation phase of a fire in buildings
clad in PUR, PIR and mineral fibre panels, the vast majority of heat, smoke
and toxic hazard is created by the materials involved in the initial fire.
It is these hazards that are likely to be critical in terms of life safety.
The third step is
to understand how insulated panels are likely to perform in a fire. In
a developing fire, the fire will generally be localised and the temperatures
lower. At this stage, the core of the insulated panels is protected by
the metal facings, unless the temperature causes the facing or panel to
collapse – for example, with some freestanding polystyrene
(EPS) cored panels where the core is seriously affected at temperatures
below 180°C.
For this reason, it is important to distinguish between
panels used for the external envelope that are securely fixed to the building
framework and which would remain in place thereby protecting the core,
and internal panels that are often freestanding or supported on other panels
and which are more vulnerable to collapse. External PUR, PIR and mineral
fibre panels are normally mechanically fixed through to the structural
steelwork of the building. Case studies have shown that these panels will
not collapse until the building collapses.
 |
|
 |
| Insulated panels are increasingly
specified because they perform well in case of fire and also deliver
on thermal efficiency requirements. |
|
Insulated panels are used internally
to line out buildings and to create environmental compartments. |
Over the last 10 years, considerable advances have been made in un
derstanding
how panels behave in fires, both through case history analyses and tests,
and the information has been made available to designers and building owners.
Extensive large-scale fire tests on a range of insulated panels have been
carried out by EPIC, in conjunction with the major test laboratories. The
information is available on the EPIC website www.epic.uk.com/fire_tests.jsp.
| The results, backed by case history
information, indicate that: |
| • |
insulated panels fixed to the building structure,
in particular the roofs and external walls of buildings, remain secure
without collapse, even when the fire changes from a developing to
developed stage |
| • |
contribution of a combustible core
to the fire – that is, as a source of fuel – is limited
and gradual in the developing stage of a fire |
| • |
the contribution in terms of smoke and gases is
minimal for MW, PIR and rigid phenolic PF but slightly greater for
PUR |
| • |
the contribution from PS cores is
greater at an earlier stage, due to the low melting point (120°C)
and can result in the generation of black smoke. The bond of the
facing is also compromised at an earlier stage, increasing the possibility
of collapse. |
Identifying different panels
The EPIC guide contains information to help those involved in fire risk
assessments or in the inspection process to identify whether the construction
is an insulated panel, what the insulating core material is, and how
the panels are fixed. These three elements are crucial in determining
whether or not there is a risk. The guide contains background information,
simple diagrams and practical checks to enable identification of the
different panels and any particular areas of risk arising from application
or use.
It is the responsibility of all those with a background in fire
safety to ensure that the correct information is made as widely available
as possible in order to assist the process and avoid misconception
and misrepresentation of perfectly safe construction materials and
methods. The fact remains that insulated panels are increasingly specified
in higher risk applications, such as schools and hospitals, because
they can perform well in the event of fire, as well as delivering on
thermal efficiency requirements.
The Fire Safety Order is a major step
forward in managing the risk of fire. If implemented effectively, it
has the potential to save lives, as well as reduce damage to property.
As an initiative, it deserves the backing of everybody in the construction
industry.
(This article appeared in the October edition of
Fire Prevention).
28 page
brochure. Insulated Panels: The Fire Safety Order (2005).
Back to top.
|